Pages

Showing posts with label two stars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label two stars. Show all posts

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Everneath By Brodi Ashton Review

Everneath (Everneath, #1)
My rating: 2 of 5 stars


I reread this to understand my true feelings on this book. It has lost one star, going from three to two. It's not that this book was awful, but nothing close to the hype.
Nikki has returned to Earth after spending six months (a century in Everneath time) in the Everneath. She wants to say goodbye to her family and friends, having pretty much ruined her goodbye before she left for the Everneath. She's hoping she can reconcile with her family and friends, but it may not be working as she hoped.
Nikki was no one special to me. She had no hobbies, no real quality to her. Did she lose her hobbies in the Everneath? But even before the Feed, she didn't seem to have anything she liked to do. I kept questioning how she spent her time when she wasn't at the Soup Kitchen, doing homework, helping her Dad, or with her friends. She had to have had some free time. She didn't even miss school once, which struck me as odd. I just couldn't see her as a fully rounded person. I also couldn't understand why she didn't accept Cole's offer, considering how much she loved the Fields, and she hadn't liked Cole showing her the Tunnels.
Jack was also pretty bland. He was a very boring love interest. I just couldn't see what he and Nikki saw in each other. We were told they were in love, but never did I EVER feel it.
Cole was a very unrealistic and uninteresting villain. If his band is so famous, how was he able to stay in a small town for so long without millions of people flocking to see his band? If he knew Nikki would never go to the Everneath with him, why did he bother to stay? Why didn't he just force Nikki to go to the Everneath with him? The only real thing I saw in him was that his feelings for Nikki seemed a little more real than Jack's, although both feelings for her were forced.
The other characters had no real development, simply background characters that existed. Of course, it's not say Nikki, Jack, and Cole had great character development, because they did not.
If the book had spent less time focusing on the relationship between Nikki and Cole, and more on the Everneath, I think I would have liked the book better. Nikki seemed very distant to me, and it was unrealistic that she showed no real fear to the Everneath. Fear should have been an easy emotion for her to get back.

Now, let's get into the failure that was the mythology.
First up, would your soul remain in the Everneath?
Were there others who had anchors?
What if Nikki committed suicide while on Earth? Would she escape the Everneath's clutches?
WHY IN THE FUCK IS THEIR EGYPTIAN MYTHOLOGY IN A BOOK ABOUT GREEK MYTHOLOGY? I won't even begin to try to understand that, or else my poor brain will explode.
Also, wouldn't someone eventually find out about the Daughters of Persephone? The kids sound emotionally neglected, so wouldn't one of them eventually crack? What if a Daughter of Persephone committed suicide beforehand? Can a son be given as a Forfeit for the Everneath?
And wouldn't the Everneath be discovered if someone noticed someone go under? What if they say the thing that took Meredith away back to the Everneath? The author tries to make the Everneath sound unknown, but she failed at it.
Her English teacher remarked not knowing Persephone had any daughters, but in Greek mythology Persephone did. Her daughter was Melinoe, and her father was Zeus. Zeus tricked Persephone into sleeping with him because he disguised himself as Hades. It is suggested by others that Hades is Melinoe's father, though. The author obviously skipped some research.

The book kept me reading, but the writing wasn't amazing. This wasn't a bad book, it just wasn't great. Read this only if you want to. I don't regret buying it, but when I read the next book in the series (I will read it), I won't buy it. I honestly can't see where the series is going.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

My NEW Review Of The Hunger Games By Suzanne Collins

The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games, #1)The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins

My rating: 2 of 5 stars


Hey guys, I've decided to make a new review for this. For my long, serious, original book review, go here:

http://katreadsbooks.blogspot.com/2011/1...
To understand a lot of what I'm about to post, you'll have to refer to my original review.

I just want to say before you read this, my friend and I are going to go see The Hunger Games in theaters this week. Why? Because my Mom says I need to get my lazy ass off the computer and go be social. That, and because I want to play Pokemon with my friend. My friend didn't like THG either, but she wants to see the movie because she thinks it looks good. I'll go because the movie theater is dark enough that I can sleep in it. And we're definitely going on a week day, hopefully during the average person's work hour. It's Spring Break, but I hope large amounts of people are gone.

So, on with the review.



The Hunger Games has a great political message:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic



The Hunger Games is a plausible dystopia:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic



The Hunger Games is right up there with Brave New World, Oryx and Crake, The Handmaid's Tale, Animal Farm, and 1984:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic



Everyone just LUVZ The Hunger Games:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic



The Hunger Games didn't copy off Battle Royale:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

I just can't believe there isn't some sort of link between the two.



The Hunger Games really reflects us as a society:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic



We can all learn something from The Hunger Games:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic



The Hunger Games doesn't deny science, basic human psychology, and how a society works (you'll definitely have to refer to my original review):

Image and video hosting by TinyPic



But Rue wuz wyte! D':

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

No you idiots, she was literally described as black in the books. I don't care how you personally saw her, but she was described as black. How you saw her doesn't change the fact that she was black.



You must have a mental disorder for not liking The Hunger Games:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic



I wish I could be Andrew Ti on this one:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic



View all my reviews

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Love Is Hell By Various Authors Review

Love Is HellLove Is Hell by Melissa Marr

My rating: 2 of 5 stars


I know, I know, I thought Prom Nights From Hell was bad, so why read this? I thought I'd test it out, see if a different book was better. But this, like PNFH, was filled with underdeveloped stories that never got over 2 stars. The only good thing is the author of Toilet wasn't in it.



"Sleeping With The Spirit" by Laurie Faria Stolarz

I liked the original premise of the story: Girl is haunted by ghost in her dreams that will stop at nothing to get help from her because she can talk to the dead. However, it quickly becomes an insta-love story, forgetting the great plot premise. I was disappointed to say the very least. Even the little sister sub plot was boring.

2/5 Stars



"Stupid Perfect World" by Scott Westerfield

What was this shit? Almost nothing was explained, the science unbelievable, and the characters, like all of them in the book, never given any characterization. But hey, I kind of expected this out of Westerfield.

2/5 Stars



"Thinner Than Water" by Justine Larbalastier

Again, little was explained, especially about why the police didn't remove the kids from most of the parents in the town. Really, nothing "WTF" story of the book.

2/5 Stars



"Fan Fictions" by Gabriella Zevin

This book made me think of Evermore for obvious reasons. Again, no explanations on anything, just a story that made no fucking sense.

2/5 Stars



"Love Struck" by Melissa Marr

Some stuff about seal people, selkies or something, and unexplained stuff is all I can describe this book as.

2/5 Stars



This really makes me wonder what passes as YA lit today. Can it have at least a little quality? These stories were so bad I can't even find GIFS to explain them with, which is just sad.



View all my reviews

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Prom Nights From Hell Review


What  is  a  prom,  you  ask.  A  prom  is  a  high  school  dance  for  horny  teens  to  spike  punch  and  keep  the  Trojan  condom  companies  running.
What  does  a  prom  look  like,  you  say.  A  prom  consists  of  girls  wearing  dresses,  guys  wearing  tuxes,  and  everyone  revealing  whether  or  not  they  can  dance.
What  does  a  prom  consist  of?
Step  1:  Get  ready  cause  you've  got  to  look  nice.  This  may  take  months  to  get  ready.  You'll  need  to  get  an  outfit. 
 
Step  2:  Get  to  the  prom  (by  limo  or  whatever).  Receive  corsage  from  date;  proceed  to  throwing  it  away.

Step  3:  Dance  (even  though  it's  obvious  you  can't)!
Step  4:  Leave  Prom.  Do  something  that  would involve  an  image  that's  inappropriate.

Step  5:  Wake  up  from  your  hangover  and  proceed  getting  on  with  your  life.  You'll  forget  this  in  ten  years.

That  my  friends  is  this  thing  we  Americans  call  "prom".  Now  what  do  when  all  hell  breaks  loose  at  prom  because  there's  a  paranormal  creature  that  broke  in  and  is  going  to  ruin  everything?


"The  Executioner's  Daughter"  by  Meg  Cabot
I  was  so  excited  that  I  was  going  to  get  to  read  Meg  Cabot  because  I  love  her  work,  but  this  was  disappointing.  I  didn't  like  the  love  interest, the  story  would've  been  better  had  it  been  longer,  the  changing  voices  wasn't  needed,  and  it  felt  too  mainstream  vampire  for  me.  No  Meg  Cabot  magic  in  sight.
2/5  stars

"The  Corsage"  by  Lauren  Myracle
"The  Monkey's  Paw"  is  an  interesting  story,  but  this  was  so  predictable  it  was  a  shame  to  read.  It  had  characters  with  no  real  personalities  and  a  story  that  puts  "The  Monkey's  Paw"  to  shame.  The  main  character  couldn't  seem  to  think  clearly  at  all  and  the  story  was  rather  boring.
2/5  stars

"Madison  Avery  and  the  Dim  Reaper"  by  Kim  Harrison
This  story  milked  on  the  cash  cow  by  writing  a  short  story  to  make  you  either  identify  with  the  Madison  Avery  books  more  or  to  make  you  read  the  series.  I  am  only  halfway  interested  in  it.  Parts  of  the  story  were  interesting,  parts  weren't.  Like  I  said,  this  is  just  to  make  you  read  the  series.
3/5  stars


"Kiss  and  Tell"  by  Michelle  Jaffe
This  was  partly  good,  partly  bad.  It  had  interesting  concepts  but  they  were  hardly  explained.  I  also  would  have  wanted  to  see  more  of  the  heroine's  powers.  The  other  girl  was  interesting,  but  after  that  I  barely  liked  anyone.  It  was  another  average  story.
3/5  stars


"Hell  on  Earth"  by  Stephenie  Meyer
This  is  where  the  fun  starts,  ladies  and  gentleman.
What  was  this  story?
Insert  enough  misogyny  to  kill  every  feminist  everywhere.  This  story  consists  of  walking  stereotypes:
All  boys  are  insanely  horny.  They  can  only  function  their  brain  and  dick  one  at  a  time.
All  girls  are  shallow  and  only  care  about  dresses  and  if  their  boyfriend  gets  stolen  from  them  (they  have  the  right  to  be  pissed).
An  evil  female  demon  is  a  total  slut  who  wants  to  ruin  everyone.
Everyone  is  straight.
Commence  punching  yourself  in  the  face.  If  he  can  do  it,  we  can  too.
The  plot  was  like  this:

Evil  slut  shrew  female  demon  creature  tries  to  ruin  everyone's  prom  fun.  Why?  Because  apparently  demons  have  to  spread  hell  at  a  high  school  dance  rather  than  at  collapsing  bridges.  Evil  slut  controls  people,  making  one  girl  a  total  slut,  one  guy  nearly  cause  a  school  shooting,  and  spike  the  punch.  Refer  back  to  shooting  Santa  robot.  So  the  demon  slut  breaks  out  stereotype  heaven  (or  hell)  and  then  she  gets  a  shrew  taming  and  falls  in  "love"  (you  know,  Meyer  is  an  expert  on  "love")  with  a  half  angel. Everything  ends  misogyny  ever  after.  This  story  was  too  long  and  could  have  been  told  quicker.  I  also  threw  the  book  because  that  story  was  that  bad.  Meyer  also  believes  lots  of  people  meet  their  true  love  in  high  school,  so  continue  punching  yourself  in  the  face.
1/5  stars

I  wanted  to  like  parts  of  this  book  (but  I  knew  Meyer  and  I  wouldn't  get  along),  but  it  ultimately  failed.  I  might  read  another  "Something  Is  Hell"  book,  but  I'm  not  sure.  At  least  I only  got  it  for  $1.00  at  a  used  bookstore.  This  book  also  donates  some  of  the  money  to  charity,  which  is  good.  But  even  that  doesn't  save  this  book.  It  gets  about  two  stars  total.

Do  I  recommend  this?  No,  there  are  better  books  out  there.

Saturday, December 17, 2011

The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins Review

I'm  not  even  posting  the  cover  for  this  book.

I've  been  lying  to  all  my  friends, I  do  not  live  in  Indiana,  I  live  on  a  nice  little  island  in  the  middle  of  nowhere  where  I'm  always  warm,  fed,  have  all  the  material  items  I  want,  internet  connection,  cable  TV,  a  DVD  player,  and  connections  with  some  libraries  in  Indiana,  who  mail  books  and  DVD's  to  my  island..  Then  some  librarian  and  her  daughter  and  some  of  their  friends  told  me  about  The  Hunger  Games.  I'd  heard  about  it  but  had  never  been  interested  in  it.  Then  they  started  harassing  asking  me  to  read  it.  I  got  sick  of  listening  to  them  whine  got  the  book  at  the  library.  Why?  The  librarian  offered  to  give  me  a  $10  Barnes  and  Noble  gift  card  if  I  read  it.  Can  someone  say  "desperate  fan-girl  zealot  person  who  wants  to  convert  me"?  Hey,  a  $10  Barnes  and  Noble  gift  card  just  to  read  this?  I  can't  say  no.  But  when  I  read  this:
I'm  serious  you  crazy  fan  people.

When  I  finished  this  book  and  explained  why  I  didn't  like  it,  here  were  some  of  my  responses:
"You're  over  thinking  it.  You  read  this  for  fun.  You're  forcing  yourself  to  hate  it."
"That  can't  be  true,  everyone  likes  The  Hunger  Games."
"How  did  you  not  like  The  Hunger  Games?"

I  will  explain  people  of  Indiana.  Let's  start  with  my  biggest  problem  with  the  book.

The  World  Building  and  the  Science
This  book  should  be  marked  in  the  fantasy  section. Why?  Let  the  great  Ray  Bradbury  explain  (everyone  bow  down  to  the  author  of  The  Illustrated  Man):

"First of all, I don't write science fiction. I've only done one science fiction book and that's Fahrenheit 451, based on reality. Science fiction is a depiction of the real. Fantasy is a depiction of the unreal. So Martian Chronicles is not science fiction, it's fantasy. It couldn't happen, you see? That's the reason it's going to be around a long time—because it's a Greek myth, and myths have staying power."

What  he  says  is  true.  This  book  tried  to  be  based  on  reality  but  it  failed  so  much.  All  the science  was  wrong  and  the  world  building  was  so  vague.  Things  happen  for  a  reason.  Since  Bush  is  out  of  office  and  no  Republican  is  president  yet,  wars  happen  for  a  reason,  but  that  reason  in  the  book  was  never  explained.  Did  they  just  start  a  nuclear  war  for  the  fuck  of  it?
So,  if  you  live  in  a  starving  society  and  you  get  on  the  train  to  the  games  and  begin  shoveling  that  rich  food  down  your  throat,  you  will  die!  Your  stomach  wouldn't  be  able  to  handle  that  much  food  or  the  richness.  That's  why  so  many  Holocaust  victims  died  after  being  freed  from  concentration  camps,  they  immediately  began  eating  large  amounts  of  food  that  was  very  rich,  like  chocolate  and  sausage.  Many  died  from  diarrhea.  Kids  who  didn't  get  constant  amounts  of  food  would  have  died  on  the  train,  even  Peeta  and  Katniss.  Even  if  they  had  food, going  from  what  they  ate  to  chocolate  cake  would  have  still  killed  them.  Besides,  Katniss  was  so  determined  to  say  everyone  was  "starving",  but  deny  a  basic  scientific  law,  bam!  Suzanne  Collins  just  gave  everyone  a  few  more  days  to  live,  a  free  pass.
Another  problem  I  had  was  the  Capitol  being  so  great.  How  does  trade  work?  Silk  was  described  a  number  of  times  in  the  book,  but  where  does  silk  come  from?  Asia,  my  friends. So  Panem  is  friends  (allies)  with  parts  of  Asia  again?  Even  though  parts  of  Asia  is  known  for  its  nuclear  weapons,  many  of  those parts  next  to  places  where  we  trade  for  silk?  What  about  all  the  other  food?  We  can't  grow  chocolate  in  America,  it  happens  mostly  in  South  America.  Are  we  friends  with  South  America?  How  did  those countries  survive?  How  does  the  Capitol  get  all  its  stuff?  We  need  trade.  
The  economy  was  poorly  explained.  I  will  now  compare  Panem  to  Egypt  during  the  period  of  the  New  Kingdom:
In  Egypt  during  the  New  Kingdom  (I  know the  picture  represents  the  Old  Kingdom,  but  everyone  will  recognize  it),  the  upper  class  (priests,  nobles,  other  elites)  often  had  the  great  stuff  like  big  houses  and  gold.  The  middle  class  were  scribes, artists,  architects,  they  had  jobs  the  lower  class  (farmers,  slaves,  servants)  wanted  because  there  jobs  sucked.  But  Pharaoh  had  the  control  over  everyone,  he  (in  the case  of  Hatshepsut,  she)  was  a  "god".  He  (she)  was  able  to  control  the  entire  kingdom  of   Egypt  along  with  areas Egypt  conquered  and  enslaved.  He  (she)  scared  the  people  into  obeying  him  (her)  because  they  feared  what  would  happen  in  the  afterlife.  However,  if  bad  things  happened (attack  by  enemies,  crops  didn't  grow), pharaoh  would  be  blamed  and  a  group  of  people  would  overthrow  the  pharaoh.  If  they  failed  in  their  revolt,  they  would  be  punished.  This  worked  pretty  well  even  though  Egypt  had  about  eighteen  or  so  dynasties,  yeah,  lots  of  rebellion.
Panem  enslaved  people  and  the  upper  class  had  nice  things  (though  it  varied  where  you  were),  there  appeared  to  be  a  small  amount  of  middle  class  (Peeta  and his  family)  and  of  course  the  lower  class  (in  Egypt  the  lower  class  made  up  80-85%  of  the  population).  However,  Egypt  traded  and  gained  a  lot  of  wealth.  Panem  showed  no  signs  on  how  it  got  chocolate  and  silk.  The  reason  the  Old  Kingdom  ended  was  because  the  pyramids  and  other  monuments  of  the  pharaoh  were  so  expensive,  they  owed  massive  amounts  of  debt.  Wouldn't  Panem  also  owe  lots  of  debt?  So  then  they'd  enslave  the  menial  Capitol  to  try  earn  a  bit  more  money?  But  most  of  all,  The  Hunger  Games  would  have  cost  money,  lots  of  money.  It  would  easily  have  been  a  massive  waste  of  money.  That  could cost  about  $1  million  at  least  if  they  were  insanely  stingy,  most  likely  way  more.  Where  in  the  fuck  is  this  money  coming  from?  Imagine  going  through  over  70  of  those  games,  the  cost  would  be  in  the  next galaxy  because  it's  way  over  that  broken  roof.  Even  one  would  be  pretty  risky  since  there's  no  big  business  about  it,  no  one  pays  taxes  for  it  or  anything.


The  idea  that  everyone  liked  the  games  in  the  Capitol  is  bullshit,  no  one can  like  all  the  same thing.  
 Not  all  of  them  would  have  liked  the  bright,  tacky  colors,  being selfish,  or  their  all  fun  lifestyle,  either.  But  Collins  would  rather  make  robots  than  actual  people.
Suicide  rates  would  most  likely  sky  rocket  around  the  game  times  in  the  poorer  areas,  from  both  12-18  year  olds  and  their  family  members.  If  they  got  in  the  games  they'd  most  likely  find  a  way  to  end  their  life,  there's  more  ways  to  kill  yourself  than  throwing  yourself  off  the  roof,  Mrs.  Collins.  Also,  wouldn't  many  be  completely  damaged  by  the  Games?  Not  just  the  contestants  and  their  family,  but  the  people shooting  the  fireballs  or  people  like  Effie  Trinket  (Effie  Trinket,  what  fucking  kind  of  name  is  that?).  Wouldn't  it  be  scarring  to  know  you're  sending  teenagers  to  their  graves?  Wouldn't  you  sit  awake  at  night,  possibly  head  to  your  bathroom,  break  a  mirror,  and  hold  that  glass  to  your  neck?  Not  everyone  can  handle  killing  people.  Why  do  you  think  the  gas  chambers  were  built  by  the  Nazis?  Because  the  Nazi  soldiers  were  traumatized  by  killing  the  minority  groups  like  the  Jews,  Russians,  and  Poles,  so  Himmler  made  sure  an  anonymous  way  to  kill  people  was  made  without  knowing  who  they  were  or  what  they  looked  like.  Here's  your  example  (Warning:  Spoils  the  ending  of  The  Boy  In  The Striped  Pajamas):
Now  imagine  just  seeing  a bunch  of  naked  men  walk  into  a  room  they  think  is  a  shower,  never  really  seeing  their  faces,  all  the  men  just  blurring  together.  Now  imagine  having  to  look  them  in  the  eyes  and  shoot  them  all.  See?  If  the  Nazi  soldiers  were  traumatized  by  this,  why  can't  those  idiots  Capitol  people  also  be  traumatized  by  this  since  they  don't  have  anonymous  people,  they  know  the  Games  contestants?  Suzanne  Collins  must  be  anti-science.  Also,  the  arena  made  no  fucking  sense  whatsoever.  Was  it  indoors?  Outdoors?  If  it  was  outdoors,  how  was  the  weather  controlled?


I  think  the  love  triangle  was  not  needed.  I  can't  see  how  Katniss  had  feelings  for  Gale  or  Peeta,  it  was  so  forced.  I  could  understand  a  slow  coming  to  terms  with  her  sexuality,  but  that's  clearly  too  much  to  ask  for  but  instead  we  get  these  two  forced  love  "interests".


I  didn't  like  any  of  the  characters  except  for  Rue.  But  of  course  she  had  to  die  and  Katniss  didn't.  I  definitely  disliked  Katniss,  perhaps  the  most  of  all  the  characters.  I  especially  hated  where  she  thought  if  two  people  heterosexuals  were  in  love  they  had  to  have  kids  because  childless  couples  can't/don't  exist  now  or  ever.  I  also  disliked  how  she  thought  if  you  didn't  get  married  you'd  grow  up  to  be  a  sad  old  drunker  like  Haymitch  with  no  hope  because  clearly  people  who  don't  get  married  will  get  all  depressed  and  drink  a  lot  because  they  don't  have  anyone  to  fuck.  I'm  still  sad  Rue  had  to  die.

I  especially  hated  the  Capitol.  They  had  jobs  that  didn't  help  the  economy  or  controlling  the  slaves  the  districts,  it'd  just  be  a big waste  of  money.  Plus  they  all  wear  bright  colors,  makeup  (even  the  guys!),  and  like  stuff  like  hair  and  stuff.  So  everyone  who  likes  that  kind  of  stuff  no  matter  what  gender  identity,  you're  a  selfish  bitch  who  doesn't  care  about  anyone  and  you're  shallow  idiots  (Gossip  Girl,  anyone?).  Great  message  Suzanne  Collins,  clearly  if  you  aren't  a  stuck  up  masculine  bitch,  you  are  bad.  Here's  what  I  thought  the  Capitol  was  like:


But  if  you're  like  me  and  happen  to  like  that  song,  you  are  bad!  Shame  on  people  who  like  to  dye  their  hair,  wear  makeup,  or  not  fit  into  a  patriarchal  gender  role!  Look  at  those  bright colors,  they  must  be  destroyed!  Oh  yeah,  that  song  is  way  better  then  the  book  will  ever  be.

The  girl  who  was  on  fire?  That  is far  from  original,  it's  been  out  since  2001  as  a  radio  single.

The  book  did  not  keep  me  reading  other  then  when  Rue  was  there,  after  that  the  book  was  always  slow,  no  matter  how  much  boring  action  there  was.


Suzanne  Collins  was  homophobic  in  this  book.  We  know  why  they  changed  the  rule  in  the  book,  so  the  straight  couple  of  Peeta  and  Katniss  could  be  together,  even  though  it  was  fake.  Only  a  boy  and  girl  were  sent  from  each  district,  not  two  boys  or  two  girls.  It's  veiled  homophobia  since  you  know,  who  cares  about  gay  teens  when  we  have  horny  straight  teens,  anyway?  The  gays  never  get  their  chance  to  survive  together  since  they'd  be  from  different  districts.  It'd  most  likely  have  been  an  even  more  powerful  story  if  it  had  been  two  boys  or  two  girls,  but  it's  a  gay  relationship,  so  who  cares?  Either  way  it  probably  wouldn't  be  a  New  York  Times  bestseller.  I'm surprised  no  one  else  has  pointed  this  out.  This  is  just  sad,  once  again  everyone  in  the  LGBT  community  are  reminded  they  are  unimportant  and  don't  exist,  heterosexuals  are  the  only  ones  who  matter.


Also,  this  only  mirrors  one  side  of  our  American  society.  Shouldn't  it  mirror  more  to  be  a  believable  and  plausible  dystopia?  I didn't  think  this  was  close  to  possible  through  most  of  the  book.  Brave  New  World  is  far  more  believable.  However,  Brave  New  World  doesn't  have  a  love  triangle  with  a  game  show,  so  it  must  suck.

The  Recipe  for  The  Hunger  Games:
Battle  Royale  (I  don't  believe  for  a  minute  Collins hadn't  heard  of  this  or  had  been  pointed  out  how  similar  these  stories  were  before  the  book  was  published)  +  The  Running  Man  +  The  Long  Walk  +  1984  (for  "Big  Brother)  +  parts  of  Lord  of  the  Flies  +  Random  Game  Shows  like  Wheel  of  Fortune  +  Survival   Based  Game  Shows  +  Stereotypical  American  Consumers  +  Love  Triangle  +  Horny  Teenagers  +  Wolf  Creatures  (big  wtf  moment)  +  Vague  world  building  +  Science  is  a  No-No  =  The  Hunger  Games  Maybe  environmentalists  will  like  this  book  for  being  "recycled". 

So,  on  with  my earlier  story.  The  evil  librarian  and  her  evil  daughter  forced  me  to  also  watch  the  movie  trailer  to  try  to  get  me  interested.  It  didn't  work,  I  refuse  to  watch  the  movie.  Why  did  I  "over  think"  the  society  Katniss  lives  in?  Dystopias  are  supposed  to  make  you  think  about  if  they  could  happen  and  this  did  not  make  me  scared  that  it  could  happen  due  to  all  the  gaping,  senseless  plot  holes.  This  wasn't  entertainment,  either.  I could  have  read  a  nice  Margaret  Atwood  novel.  Suzanne  Collins  didn't  even  scare  me  in  the  slightest.  So,  I'm  going  to  stay  on  my  island  and  hopefully  never  see  this  book  again.  But  I  ended  kind  of  happily,  I  got  my  $10  Barnes  and  Noble  gift  card!  I  only  wen t through  so  many  pages  of  this  junk,  no t to  mention  dozens  of  typos.

I  have  heard  of  someone  who  also  didn't  like  this  book  had  been  told  by  someone  they  must  have  a  mental  problem (they  said  the  person  was  mentally  retarded  just  because  they  didn't  like  this  book).  I  have  a  form  of  autism  called  Asperger's  Syndrome  and  it  didn't  change  how  I  felt  about  this  book.  Respect  me  and  respect  people  who  are  worse  off  than  me.  I  know  mentally  retarded  people  and  their  life  is  tough.  My  island  is  metaphorical,  I  do  actually  live  in  Indiana.  I  didn't  like  this  book.  If  you  did,  please  try  to  understand  me.  Don't  make  remarks  that  ultimately  damage  people  less  fortunate  people  than  you  who  have  mental  problems.  But  don't  pity  me,  either.  I  face  my  life,  fighting  people  to  stop  disrespecting  people  who  have  mental  issues.  I  know  longer  say  the  word  "retarded"  as  an  insult,  it's  only  in  my  vocabulary  to  tell  whether  a  person  has  a  mental  issue  or  not.  I  am  currently  the  only  person  in  my  school  who  I know  didn't  like  this  book.

So,  want  good  books  about  corrupted  governments  and  controlling  hate  groups  that  are  non-fiction  and  much  more  real  than  this  and  who  do  the  kinds  of  things  you  hear  about  in  this  book  or  worse?  That  are  a  real  threat  to  us?










These  are  real stories  of  real  people  and  real  groups  who  either  overcome  oppression  or  violently  hurt  people,  or  present  a  harsh  reality.  If  you  think  any  dystopia  is  truly  scary,  read  these  because  fiction  is  nothing compared  to  this.  I  highly  recommend  these.
 
Fiction  you  should  read  instead:



 


Movies  you  should  watch  instead:


(Sorry  they're  all  Nazi  movies,  if  you  can  tell  me  any  good  North  Korea,  Russian  Communist,  or  any  good   hate  group  documentary  or  movie,  it  would  be  appreciated,  these  are  all  I  know.)

So  why  did  I  post  all  those  books  and  movies?  Because  I  want  you  to  think  about  real  threats  we  face.  I  definitely  suggest  Execution  By  Hunger  if  you're  interested  in  hunger  and  starvation. 





I  give  this  book  2  stars  because  I  liked  Rue  and  only  kept  reading  during  the  parts  where  she  was  in  the  book.  I  will  not  be  reading  the  rest  of  the  series  or  seeing  the  movie.

Monday, December 5, 2011

The Eleventh Plague by Jeff Hirsch Review

The  Cover  of  My  Very  Own  Copy
Does  Jeff  Hirsch  think  his  readers  are  idiots?  I  hope  he  doesn't,  but  it  sure  as  hell  seems  like  it.  What  he  wrote  has  so  many  plot  holes  it's  like  a  burial  site.  Examples:
America  apparently  bombed  North  Korea.
What  is  this,  Idiot  Con?  No  one  bombs  North  Korea  in  fear  of their  nukes.  They  try  to  either  have  nothing  to  do  with  them  or  be  their  allies.  North  Korea  is  an  ally  of  China.  Apparently  America bombed  China  and  it's  allies  in  the  book,  Hirsch  not  stating  which  allies.  So  I  was  lead  to  believe  America  bombed  North  Korea.  Wow,  that  is  just  sad.
Apparently  Once  You  Touch  The  Virus,  You  Die.
What  the  hell,  you  touch  a  doorknob  with  the  eleventh  plague's  virus  on  it  and  you're  basically  instantly  dead?  That's  not  how  a  fucking  virus  works,  it  goes into  your  body,  invades  a  cell,  waits  for  a  period  of  time  (some  periods  short,  some  long)  reproducing,  bursts  open  the  cell  and  continues  constantly  reproducing  viruses,  making  people  suffer.  Touching  a  virus  instantly  does  not  kill  you,  however  it  can  enter  the  body.  That's  why  people  are  careful  not  to  touch  blood  because  they  may  get  HIV  and  other  STD  (and  regular,  non  sexually  transmitted)  viruses  into  their  body.  If  they  touch  blood  and  say  they  get  an  HIV  virus,  touching  the  virus  itself  won't  kill  them,  the  virus  killing  white  blood  cells  will  kill  them.
The  Government  Just  Stopped
Did  someone  shoot  the  president?  Did  China  have  our  government  killed?  Did  they  escape  to  other countries  like  royals  in  Europe  did  when  Hitler  invaded  them  in  WWII?  How  in  the  hell  did  the government  collapse?  
It  Was  Described  that  LOTS  of  People  Died  From  the  Plague
It  sounded  like  other  countries  were  bombed,  perhaps  America's  allies  like  Great  Britain.  I  can  understand  that,  but  it  sounded  like  SO  many  countries  were  bombed.  It  was  like  they  bombed  Norway,  a  neutral  country.  China  wouldn't  waste  nukes  on  Norway  unless  they  have  some  big  problem  with  them,  which  they  don't  and  in  the  book  also  didn't.
The  Red  Cross?
Wouldn't  America  get  some  help  from  other  countries?  We  do  have  allies.  Is  the  Chinese  preventing  them?  It  was  never  explained.
Google  Earth
Unless  the  satellites  shut  down,  the  Chinese  could  use  military  satellites  to  find  camps  of  people  like  Settler's  Landing.  Their  secret  nook  would  be  gone.
The  Supplies
The  supplies  sounded  endless,  which  they  aren't.
Do  They  Have  Enough  Food?
Unless  Settler's  Landing  had  absolutely  enough  food,  including  excess,  there  would  be  no  no  school.  That's  how  all  ancient  societies  worked,  once  you  have  a  definite  food  crop  can  you  settle  in  one  place  and  start  having  other  jobs  than  farming.  I  was  never  for  sure  about  Settler's  Landing.
Global  Warming
It  said  we  were  losing  oil  when  the Collapse  happened,  so   have  the icecaps  melted?  Where  are  all  the  hurricanes  and  such  that  happens  because  of  global  warming?  It's  such  a  large,  gaping  plot  hole  you  could  fall  through  it.
Slavers?
I  wasn't  always  sure  what  they  did.  They  mentioned  stuff  like  mercenaries  and  plantations.  They  were  never  explained,  so  I  went  like  this:  "What?"
It  Could  Have  Been  A  Different  Country
I  can  see  a  war  happening  over  backpackers  mistaken  as  spies,  but  I'm  sure  there  would  first  be  a  meeting  between  the  American  and  Chinese  government.  Plus,  wouldn't  the  backpackers  have  known  where  and  where  not  to  go?  When  I  first  got  the  book  do you  know  what  I  thought  the  war  would  have  been  over?  I  thought  it  would  have  been  over  Chinese  manufacturing  American  products.  This  is  never  even  mentioned  in  the  book,  but  I  can  see  us  fighting  over  our  debt  to  China  before  backpackers.  Like  I  said,  the  Chinese  making  our  stuff  was  too  touchy  for  Jeff  Hirsch.  This  could  have  happened  in  a  different  country,  we  aren't  allies  with  everyone.  It  could  have  been  North  Korea  (the  backpackers  would've  snuck  in  to  get  there)  and  that  definitely would've  been  hell.  China  would  have  fought  with  North  Korea  most  likely.  I  think  Hirsch  just  thought  to  put  China  in  because  it's  China.
Pregnancy
Steve's  grandfather  was  mad  at  Steve's  mom  for  giving  birth  to  Steve's  sister  (which  killed  her  and  her  child).  What  the  hell?  Do  you  expect  there  to  be  abortion  clinics  in  that  hellish  landscape?  And  an  illegal  abortion  would  most  likely  be  fatal,  knitting  needles  and  clothes  hangers  are  always  evil.
Animals?
They  may  not  have  gotten  sick  with  the  plague,  but  wouldn't  the bombing  have  also  effected  them? 
America  Bombed  It's  Own  Cities
It's  currently  illegal  for  America  to  do  that.  

I  had  trouble  believing  most  of  the  stuff  in  this  book,  like  I  said,  full  of  holes.  However,  after  that  the  writing  was  pretty  good,  but  I  only  basically  knew  six  characters  immediately,  Steve,  Jenny,  Violet,  Steve's  Dad,  Grandfather,  and  Mom.  The  others  basically  just  meshed  together.  I  only  liked  Steve  and  Jenny,  that's  pretty  much  it.  The  relationship  between  all  the  teens  were  realistic,  but  I  never  believed  Steve  and  Jenny  were  in  love.  I  could  see  them  as  friends  (with  benefits),  but  I  could  never  imagine  them  as  in  love.  It  was  so  insta-love,  too.

2  stars,  but  it  was  great  I  got  this  for  only  $9  rather  than  the  normal  $18.  :)
So  yeah,  I  only  liked  the  non  plot  holed  parts,  which  were  few.  And  the  book  does  get  boring,  the  action  only  comes  at  the  end.  I  know  other  ;people  will  like  it  more  than  I  do,  though.  So  read  if  you  wish.

Ah,  to  make  myself  feel  better  after  reading this  I'm  reading  Cat's  Eye  by  Margaret  Atwood.  She'll  make  everything  better.